Home | All Fwiends | Random | Online | Music | Blog | Search

UnaTeddy's Blog

"The Industrial Revolution was NOT cool"
61 years old
United States
Last Login: 1623117925000
Contacting UnaTeddy
All Blogs (10/10)

Part 12.

Among Us is free on the Epic Games Store

Those who are most sensitive about “politically incorrect” terminology are not the average black ghetto- dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any “oppressed” group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual white males from middle- to upper-middle-class families.


Part 11.

It has come to my attention that the man that I gave my full support as he ran for office, Jacket (2040), has died tragically. He died retaliating against the government for the attempted murder of his squad in Vietnam and I commend him fully for that. May he fight the good fight in hell.

When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights activists, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities and about anything that is said concerning minorities. The terms “negro,” “oriental,” “handicapped” or “chick” for an African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation. “Broad” and “chick” were merely the feminine equivalents of “guy,” “dude” or “fellow.” The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal rights activists have gone so far as to reject the word “pet” and insist on its replacement by “animal companion.” Leftish anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the world “primitive” by “nonliterate.” They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)

Also; I was helped in making a "Google Drive" for my "past blogs" so here is the 'link' for that

1 Comment

Part 10.

In light of recent events I am now a full supporter for President JACKET in 2040!! FULL TRANSPARENCY HE GAVE ME A GIFT IN THE LAST BLOG POST and it was awesome


By “feelings of inferiority” we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strict sense but a whole spectrum of related traits; low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self- hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have some such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.


Part 9.

President Jacket has plans to downsize the Postal Service. From point onward, I am BOYCOTTING HIM

The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we call “feelings of inferiority” and “oversocialization.” Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of modern leftism; but this segment is highly influential.


Part 8.

My teeth hurt

Even so, our conception of leftism will remain a good deal less clear than we would wish, but there doesn’t seem to be any remedy for this. All we are trying to do here is indicate in a rough and approximate way the two psychological tendencies that we believe are the main driving force of modern leftism. We by no means claim to be telling the WHOLE truth about leftist psychology. Also, our discussion is meant to apply to modern leftism only. We leave open the question of the extent to which our discussion could be applied to the leftists of the 19th and early 20th centuries.


Part 7.

My brother David has been acting really weird ever since The Washington Post published my book, I'm not sure why, he's always been a Leftist, ew, I hope he's not getting any ideas...

But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th century leftism could have been practically identified with socialism. Today the movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be called a leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly socialists, collectivists, “politically correct” types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like. But not everyone who is associated with one of these movements is a leftist. What we are trying to get at in discussing leftism is not so much movement or an ideology as a psychological type, or rather a collection of related types. Thus, what we mean by “leftism” will emerge more clearly in the course of our discussion of leftist psychology. (Also, see paragraphs 227-230.)


Part 6.

There's so many things I had missed in my little cabin in the woods, I forgot how much I hate this place, the only good we've done as a society are the postal service and explosive devices. No correlation between the two haha

Almost everyone will agree that we live in a deeply troubled society. One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern society in general.


Part 5.

I used to be a protesting type of person, back in my youth we were protesting the war and I was up on the White House Lawn, I then proceeded to vomit all over the White House steps. It was kind of "poggers" is that how you kids use that?

In this article we give attention to only some of the negative developments that have grown out of the industrial-technological system. Other such developments we mention only briefly or ignore altogether. This does not mean that we regard these other developments as unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which we have something new to say. For example, since there are well-developed environmental and wilderness movements, we have written very little about environmental degradation or the destruction of wild nature, even though we consider these to be highly important.

No Comment

Part 4.

I love the anarchical style of tearing down the government, but I also love the United States Postal Service. Bless our boys in blue for always getting my packages there on time.

We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can’t predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society.

No Comment

Part 3.

Although I absolutely hate this machine that feeds into the never-ending cycle of destruction that capitalism brings, I do think it's useful. I wish I had this many ways of connecting with people when I were younger. no one talked to me.

If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.